Music storing service infringed copyright
A Tokyo district court has found that a service allowing users to store their music online was infringing copyright. Image City allowed users to store their music from CDs on an off-site server, allowing them to later download them to mobile phones while on-the-go. The Japanese music copyright association (JASRAC) attacked the service and claimed it was obviously infringing copyrights.
JASRAC demanded that the service be taken offline. Image City denied any wrong doing, saying that the music stored on its servers was owned by the customer that uploaded it. The company believed that since users and the company were not copying the music for other people’s use, they were essentially doing nothing wrong.
The Judge disagreed and ruled in favor of the Japanese music copyright association.
http://www.afterdawn.com/news/archive/9892.cfm

Comments(0)
People are downloading more porn for free using P2P networks than downloading legal video downloads, according to research by analysts at the NPD Group.
Without getting into the quagmire that is the debate over P2P, fronted on one side by sane technologically able people and on the other by a dying breed of middlemen with an outdated business model (ok, so I dipped a toe into the marsh), the use of the technology aptly includes both legitimate claims of copyright infringement and illegitimate claims that this is all the technology is good for. In fact, P2P is rapidly becoming the de-facto mechanism distribution of all sorts of content on the Internet.But I digress — if you use P2P software, and this can include programs that use it for distribution (which may not be immediately apparent to you), whether you like it or not you’re putting your IP address and machine on the global invitation list. It doesn’t matter that you’ve got a firewall — for while it does its job at the protocol and port level, it can’t protect you from the applications you run that openly share information about you or your machine.







